Visit JCPCAll cases
1319 Cases
UKSC/2025/0073
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Should the Appellant have been treated as an overstayer at the time he applied for leave to remain as a skilled worker?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0022
•
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Can a local planning authority issue a decision notice granting planning permission for a development subject to a condition that is inconsistent with the operative part of that notice?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0077
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:The Upper Tribunal held that the First-Tier Tribunal made several errors of law in allowing an applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse the appellant’s application for leave to remain. Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the Upper Tribunal’s decision?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0061
•
INTERNATIONAL
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in holding that an exception to a foreign state’s right to adjudicative immunity under s 1 of the State Immunity Act 1978 can be established by an issue estoppel arising from a decision of a foreign court.
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0057
•
FAMILY
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal correct to refuse the appellant’s application for an extension of time to appeal the High Court’s order granting a decree nisi (a provisional order for divorce) for the parties and refusing recognition of a divorce in Kosovo?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0036
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal correct to dismiss the appellant’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2024/0093
•
EU LAW
Hearing listedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong: (i) in its understanding of the correct approach to the test to identify a “benefit” for the purposes of the applicable EU Regulations; and (ii) to conclude that the position on this was sufficiently clear that no reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) was needed?
Last updated: 1 July 2025
UKSC/2025/0089
•
EMPLOYMENT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by remitting the case to the Employment Appeals Tribunal and failing to protect the Appellant’s human rights?
Last updated: 27 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0054
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:(1) Was a letter serving a gas safety certificate etc a “notice” within the meaning of the tenancy agreement? (2) Is there a common law presumption that a properly addressed letter that is posted is presumed to be received unless the intended recipient can prove the contrary?
Last updated: 27 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0078
•
IMMIGRATION
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in allowing the SSHD’s appeal and remitting the case back to the Upper Tribunal?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0062
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:In circumstances where a person suspected of an offence has been arrested and the police are considering their release on bail, does the victim of the alleged offence have a right to be consulted as to whether bail should be granted and on what conditions, so far as that is reasonably practicable?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2024/0089
•
FAMILY
Judgment scheduledCase summary:When does non-matrimonial property become matrimonial property in the context of financial remedy proceedings, and how should the sharing principle be applied to such property?
Last updated: 26 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0055
•
COMMERCIAL
Appeal issuedCase summary:(1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to distinguish between a “half secret’” and a “fully secret” commission for the purpose of determining whether the commission should be treated as a bribe that attracts restitutionary liability for the amount of the bribe? (2) Alternatively, if “half secret” commissions are to be treated distinctly from “fully secret” commissions, was the Court of Appeal wrong to apply a test of dishonesty at all and, in any event, a test which is inconsistent with the decision in Hurstanger and which required more than that the commission-payer knew of the existence of a fiduciary relationship?
Linked casesCross Appeal
Last updated: 25 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0050
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Whether a local authority’s duty to house homeless applicants under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996 ends by operation of law or whether the local authority is required to make a decision that the duty has ended.
Last updated: 24 June 2025
UKSC/2025/0048
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by misunderstanding the requirements of effective judicial protection and adopting an incorrect approach to conforming interpretation?
Last updated: 24 June 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.